Some links on this page are affiliate links. If you purchase through them, we may earn a commission at no additional cost to you. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Across roughly 14 days in Montana and Idaho, I used the Trail Back poles with normal hunting loads ranging from about 35 pounds early in my first trip to roughly 20 to 25 pounds once I learned what I actually needed. Montana brought more than a foot of snow at times along with mud and ice, while Idaho exposed them to rockier mountain terrain that put more wear on the carbide Tech Tips. I used them on climbs, descents, game trails, and uneven terrain, but I have not tested them during a true heavy meat pack-out.
Downhill Support
Descending was where the poles made the biggest difference for me. They helped reduce pressure on my knees and made steep downhill movement feel more controlled.
Stability and Foot Placement
The poles reduced the amount of constant balance correction I felt like I was making and helped make my pace and foot placement more intentional.
Use Across Pack Weights
They remained useful when my pack was around 35 pounds early in Montana and after I reduced it to roughly 20 to 25 pounds later in the hunt.
Mixed-Condition Durability
Across roughly 14 field days in Montana and Idaho, I used them in snow, mud, ice, and rocky mountain terrain without developing a reason to replace them.
Pack Storage
They attached easily to the side of my RMEF Eberlestock pack and were simple enough to stow that I never felt forced to keep using them once the terrain flattened out.
Grip Comfort
The grips stayed comfortable through the field use described, although longer-term grip and strap durability still needs further evaluation.
Descents Changed My Mind
I expected climbing to be the hardest part. Coming downhill was where the poles earned the most trust by helping absorb some of the load and taking pressure off my beat-up knees.
Stability Matters Even With a Lighter Pack
Dropping my pack from roughly 35 pounds to 20 to 25 did not make the poles less useful. The benefit was not only load support. It was reducing constant balance corrections as I moved.
They Changed How I Moved
Using the poles made my pace and foot placement more deliberate. I felt like I spent less energy making tiny corrections on uneven ground.
Solid Across Changing Conditions
Snow, mud, ice, and rock never gave me a reason to stop trusting them. The trekking baskets worked in more than a foot of snow, and the poles remained useful across both Montana and Idaho.
Know What the Tool Is Supposed to Do
A few slips at the FlickLock happened when I was putting more weight into the poles than I should have. That taught me more about how trekking poles are meant to work than it did about the poles themselves.
I cannot make a useful direct comparison with another trekking pole system because these were my first pair. I am sure lighter options may exist, but the Trail Back poles have never felt heavy enough to make me question carrying them. Based on my experience, I would buy the same pair again, while recognizing that a direct comparison still needs future field testing.
Read more in-depth reviews and field guides to help you get outside, prepared, and confident.