Search

Eberlestock RMEF Team Elk Pack

A comfortable, rugged framed hunting pack that helped bridge the gap from New England hunting to western mountains, but its weight and scabbard limitations make it harder to trust for serious long-mile hunts.
Picture of Matt Anderson
Matt Anderson

at a glance

Price 399
Weight 7 lbs 8 oz
Key Feature Integrated rifle scabbard system for hands-free carry
Best Use Short-to-moderate approach hunts, gear hauling, and hunters prioritizing comfort + durability over weight savings

On This Page

PROS

  • Very comfortable once adjusted
  • Carries weight securely on the hips
  • No reported hot spots
  • Major upgrade over frameless and tactical-style packs
  • Quiet, rugged fabric
  • Handles rough weather better than expected
  • Useful rifle scabbard when used carefully
  • Still useful as a general gear hauler

cons

  • Heavy for serious western miles
  • Not an ultralight mountain hunting pack
  • Scabbard can create real risk if forced
  • Large spotting scope storage feels undersized
  • Limited clean options for alternate rifle carry
  • Less modular than the author would prefer now
  • Exact current product status needs verification

Check Price on amazon

We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

View on Amazon

The First Real Western Pack

Before this pack, most of the author’s hunting was in New England, where a basic bag was enough for layers, snacks, and local days in the woods. Montana changed the requirements. He wanted a real frame for carrying mountain weight and a rifle scabbard that could keep the gun out of the way on early hikes. Coming from a frameless Slumberjack pack and a 5.11 Rush 72, this Eberlestock was an immediate upgrade. It carried better, felt more stable, and gave the author a more serious platform for a first western elk and mule deer hunt. That trip started around 55°F and sunny, then turned into roughly 11°F with 18 inches of snow in the mountains by day three. The pack handled that swing better than expected. The early lesson was simple: a real frame matters. The later lesson was more complicated. Once the author had more time in the mountains, the pack’s comfort still stood out, but so did the weight, the scabbard risk, and the limits around optics and rifle carry.

It Still Has a Job, Just Not Every Job

This pack stays in the conversation because it earned real trust in comfort and toughness. It carried 30 lb hunting loads well in Montana, handled heavier training rucks, and still works for practical hauling, duck blind walks, and situations where comfort matters more than cutting every ounce. That said, it no longer feels like the author’s answer for every western hunt. The more specific the mission gets — longer miles, lighter systems, faster rifle access, bigger optics — the more its limitations show. It has not been retired because it failed. It has been narrowed into the role it actually fits. That may be the most honest place for it. Not the perfect western pack. Not a mistake. A rugged, comfortable tool that helped the author learn what mattered next.

Performance Metrics

Hip-Carried Load

The pack carried weight well once adjusted, with the load living on the hips and no reported hot spots. The author also used it for heavier training rucks around 50–55 lb without seeing load-carrying ability as the limiting factor.

Fabric Toughness

The fabric felt quiet and well-built, handled a sharp Montana weather swing, and did not seem to let wet exterior conditions affect the inside of the pack during normal use.

Rifle Scabbard

The scabbard was useful for pre-dawn hikes and keeping the rifle out of the way, but forcing the rifle into the scabbard while the pack was loaded loosened the rifle’s pic rail and led to a missed shot.

Weight Penalty

The pack carried well but was not light. The author and guides both recognized that it was heavier than many modern western hunting pack setups.

Spotting Scope Storage

The side pockets did not provide a good home for the author’s large, heavy spotting scope. A compact spotter may work better, but large optics created frustration.

The comfort is undeniable, but for serious western miles, the weight and a few feature limitations are hard to ignore.

Key Takeaways

Comfort Matters Most When the Country Gets Steep

The biggest win was how the pack carried. Once adjusted, the weight stayed on the hips, rode securely, and felt like a major upgrade from frameless or tactical-style bags.

Heavy Packs Start the Day Behind

Even when a pack carries well, extra base weight still shows up on long mountain days. Comfort does not erase the cost of carrying more than needed.

A Scabbard Is Useful Until It Gets Forced

The rifle scabbard worked for hands-free hiking, but forcing a rifle into it while the pack was loaded caused a scope issue that cost a shot. That feature now gets used carefully or not at all.

Modularity Matters More After the First Trip

Early on, the author wanted a real frame and rifle scabbard. After more experience, lighter weight and cleaner rifle-carry options became more important.

Rugged Fabric Still Counts

The pack handled a hard Montana weather swing, stayed quiet, and kept the inside from feeling compromised even when the outside looked soaked.

FAQ

Comfort Earned Its Place, But Weight Changed the Question

This pack proved itself as a comfortable, rugged step up from basic bags, especially on a first western hunt where the weather turned hard fast. But the longer the author spent around western systems, the more the weight, scabbard risk, and limited modularity mattered. It still has a role for hauling gear and shorter approaches, but for serious western miles, the lesson points toward something lighter and easier to adapt.

other GEar that works as hard as you

Eberlestock Recon Bino Harness
  • Gear Deep Dives

The North Face One Bag Deep Dive (Field Tested)
  • Gear Deep Dives

Gerber Center-Drive Multi-Tool Review

gear guides. real reviews. field tested

Read more in-depth reviews and field guides to help you get outside, prepared, and confident.

explore all deep dives